Friday, February 27, 2009

WHAT A NUISANCE

I read this article the other day and realized it was supposed to cause you to say, "What a load of crap! I can't believe the state of the legal system today!"

However, when I read it I didn't get quite that. Instead I realized how little someone understood of the legal rights involved.

There are two kinds of nuisance: public and private. Since it seems to only be affecting one person it must be a private nuisance. To be able to recover for private nuisance the elements need to be proved: the nuisance was (1) intentional, (2) nontrespassory, (3) unreasonable, (4) substantial enough to affect use and enjoyment of the apartment.

1. Intentional is satisfied if the neighbor caused the dogs to bark or if he knows the dogs are barking.
2. Since the neighbor or dogs are not coming onto the property of another this is nontrespassory.
3. Unreasonable requires a showing of either a serious injury, or showing that the gravity of harm is outweighed by the utility of the barking.
4. If a reasonable person living in the community would regard the barking as seriously annoying this is probably satisfied.

Sounds reasonable enough that the annoyed lady could prove this. Next, she is asking for $500,000 and an injunction to keep the barking out of her apartment.

The remedies available for a private nuisance do include injunction and damages. A court could give the injunction if the benefit of not hearing the dogs bark is greater than the harm caused by preventing it. For damages there are a few considerations. First, is the court going to give permanent or continuing damages? Permanent will include all future damages caused by barking, and continuing only includes damages that have already happened (to get future damages you have to sue after they happen). Next, the measure of damages is determined by the diminished rental value or use value. Looking at Upper West Side real estate listings -- the first two I saw were $7.5 million and $360,000 (with several priced between and over the two). The article did not say what address we are at, but it is possible we're talking about a pricey location. $500,000 worth of diminished use value may not be such a stretch.

So what you should learn is this: 1) keep your dog quiet and be a good neighbor, 2) journalists don't tell know the whole story, and 3) the legal system isn't as messed up as you may think. I would also be very surprised if this even went to court. Most civil cases are settled out of court (odds of going to court: somewhere around 1 out of 46).

Thursday, February 19, 2009

THE BEARD-SECOND

Because the other measurements were just too big: The Beard-second.

KIPLING

Ship me somewheres east of Suez, where the best is like the worst, Where there aren't no Ten Commandments, an' a man can raise a thirst.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

MORE PROOF WALKING IS LAME

(when compared to bicycling.)

Monday, February 9, 2009

ROUND 3

Tonight was round 3 of the mock trial competition. We were seeded eight of eight and placed against the first seeded team. They were real good, and I feel like I have really honed my mock trial skills. More when the scores are released.

UPDATE: We lost! Oh well. I'm still waiting to see what the scoring sheets said.

Friday, February 6, 2009

MOCK TRIAL II

This Tuesday and Wednesday were rounds one and two, respectively, of the Renna and Jeff Embry Mock Trial Competition. Next Monday is round one of the elimination rounds for those who broke in the preliminary rounds.

We will be competing on Monday. We lost the first preliminary trial and won the second one.

The hardest part of the competition has been dealing with our limited understanding of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Even in the round we won was not won with our FRE skills. I think our strength has been our casual approach. I did not ask questions from a list on direct (was actually complimented for my conversational style on this), and I didn't prep or practice a closing statement before the trial.

Monday may be our last day in this competition -- as we are going to be matched against a team with plenty of experience. This does not mean we are going to roll over and turn in a loss without a fight. This weekend will be spent reviewing the FRE.